Comparison of a Person-Centered Pregnancy Prevention Question and One Key Question® to Assess Postpartum Contraceptive Needs.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy intention is widely used to screen for contraceptive needs, yet its relevance to postpartum individuals has not been demonstrated. METHODS: We surveyed 234 postpartum individuals to assess the alignment between pregnancy intentions in the next year and current desire to prevent pregnancy. RESULTS: Most individuals (87%) desired pregnancy prevention now, including 73% of individuals who desired or were ambivalent about pregnancy in the next year. CONCLUSION: A majority of individuals considering pregnancy in the next year desired pregnancy prevention now. Directly assessing current desire to prevent pregnancy may be more specific for contraceptive needs in postpartum individuals.

A Decision Aid to Support Tubal Sterilization Decision-Making Among Pregnant Women: The MyDecision/MiDecisión Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tubal sterilization is common, especially among individuals with low income. There is substantial misunderstanding about sterilization among those who have undergone the procedure, suggesting suboptimal decision-making about a method that permanently ends reproductive capacity. Objective: To test the efficacy of a web-based decision aid for improving tubal sterilization decision quality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial conducted between March 2020 and November 2023 included English- or Spanish-speaking pregnant cisgender women aged 21 to 45 years who had Medicaid insurance and were contemplating tubal sterilization after delivery. Participants were recruited from outpatient obstetric clinics in 3 US cities. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care (control arm) or to usual care plus a web-based decision aid (MyDecision/MiDecisión) (intervention arm). The aid includes written, audio, and video information about tubal sterilization procedures; an interactive table comparing contraceptive options; values-clarifying exercises; knowledge checks; and a summary report. Main Outcomes and Measures: The co-primary outcomes were tubal sterilization knowledge and decisional conflict regarding the contraceptive decision. Knowledge was measured as the percentage of correct responses to 10 true-false items. Decisional conflict was measured using the low-literacy Decision Conflict Scale, with lower scores on a range from 0 to 100 indicating less conflict. Results: Among the 350 participants, mean (SD) age was 29.7 (5.1) years. Compared with the usual care group, participants randomized to the decision aid had significantly higher tubal sterilization knowledge (mean [SD] proportion of questions answered correctly, 76.5% [16.9%] vs 55.6% [22.6%]; P < .001) and lower decisional conflict scores (mean [SD], 12.7 [16.6] vs 18.7 [20.8] points; P = .002). The greatest knowledge differences between the 2 groups were for items about permanence, with more participants in the intervention arm answering correctly that tubal sterilization is not easily reversible (90.1% vs 39.3%; odds ratio [OR], 14.2 [95% CI, 7.9-25.4]; P < .001) and that the tubes do not spontaneously "come untied" (86.6% vs 33.7%; OR, 13.0 [95% CI, 7.6-22.4]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: MyDecision/MiDecisión significantly improved tubal sterilization decision-making quality compared with usual care only. This scalable decision aid can be implemented into clinical practice to supplement practitioner counseling. These results are particularly important given the recent increase in demand for permanent contraception after the US Supreme Court decision overturning federal abortion protections. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04097717.

Meeting people's pregnancy prevention needs: Let's not force people to state an "Intention".

Pregnancy intention screening does not identify need for pregnancy prevention and ignores the nuances of lived experiences while reinforcing white middle-class normative expectations. Asking about desire for contraception is a patient-centered approach to meeting people's needs.

Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study.

Background: In the U.S. and globally, dominant metrics of contraceptive access focus on the use of certain contraceptive methods and do not address self-defined need for contraception; therefore, these metrics fail to attend to person-centeredness, a key component of healthcare quality. This study addresses this gap by presenting new data from the U.S. on preferred contraceptive method use, a person-centered contraceptive access indicator. Additionally, we examine the association between key aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use. Methods: We fielded a nationally representative survey in the U.S. in English and Spanish in 2022, surveying non-sterile 15-44-year-olds assigned female sex at birth. Among current and prospective contraceptive users (unweighted n = 2119), we describe preferred method use, reasons for non-use, and differences in preferred method use by sociodemographic characteristics. We conduct logistic regression analyses examining the association between four aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use. Findings: A quarter (25.2%) of current and prospective users reported there was another method they would like to use, with oral contraception and vasectomy most selected. Reasons for non-use of preferred contraception included side effects (28.8%), sex-related reasons (25.1%), logistics/knowledge barriers (18.6%), safety concerns (18.3%), and cost (17.6%). In adjusted logistic regression analyses, respondents who felt they had enough information to choose appropriate contraception (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 3.31; 95% CI 2.10, 5.21), were very (AOR 9.24; 95% CI 4.29, 19.91) or somewhat confident (AOR 3.78; 95% CI 1.76, 8.12) they could obtain desired contraception, had received person-centered contraceptive counseling (AOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.33, 2.23), and had not experienced discrimination in family planning settings (AOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.13, 2.20) had increased odds of preferred contraceptive method use. Interpretation: An estimated 8.1 million individuals in the U.S. are not using a preferred contraceptive method. Interventions should focus on holistic, person-centered contraceptive access, given the implications of information, self-efficacy, and discriminatory care for preferred method use. Funding: Arnold Ventures.

Contraceptive counseling, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation among women in the U.S. southeast.

OBJECTIVES: We used the validated Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale to examine experiences with counseling and associations between counseling quality, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation at the population level in two southeastern states. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from the Statewide Survey of Women, a probability-based sample of reproductive-aged women in Alabama and South Carolina in 2017/18. We included women using a contraceptive method and reporting a contraceptive visit in the past year (n = 1265). Respondents rated their most recent provider experience across four PCCC items. Regression analyses examined relationships between counseling quality and outcomes of interest, and path analysis examined the extent to which method satisfaction mediated the effects of counseling quality on planned continuation. RESULTS: Over half of participants (54%) reported optimal contraceptive counseling. Optimal counseling was associated with method satisfaction (aPR = 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.29) in adjusted models. Optimal counseling was marginally associated with planned discontinuation in the bivariate analysis but was attenuated in the adjusted model (aPR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.98-1.18). In the path analysis, counseling quality influenced method satisfaction (0.143 (0.045), p = 0.001) which influenced planned continuation, controlling for PCCC (0.74 (0.07), p < 0.001). The total indirect effect of counseling quality on planned continuation was significant (0.106 (0.03), p = 0.001), and a residual direct effect from counseling quality to planned continuation was noted (0.106 (0.03), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Counseling quality is independently associated with method satisfaction at the population level. The effect of counseling on planned continuation is partially mediated by method satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS: Interventions to support person-centered contraceptive counseling promise to improve quality of care, patient experience with care, and reproductive outcomes.

Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs.

In June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, opening the door to state-level abortion bans. By August 2023, 17 states banned abortion or instituted early gestational age bans. We performed an analysis to assess the proportion of accredited US family medicine residency programs and trainees in states with abortion restrictions. Twenty-nine percent of family medicine residency programs (n = 201) and residents (n = 3,930) are in states with bans or very restrictive policies. Family medicine residency programs must optimize training and exposure to abortion within their contexts, so graduates are able to care for patients seeking abortions or needing follow-up care.

Lack of pregnancy intention or interest in pregnancy prevention now? How best to screen for desire for contraceptive care.

OBJECTIVES: To assess relationship between pregnancy intention and current desire for pregnancy prevention. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from two state population-based surveys, we compared One Key Question® and current pregnancy prevention desire. RESULTS: The majority who indicated ambivalence toward pregnancy (54%) and some respondents who indicated that they want to become pregnant in a year (30%) desired pregnancy prevention now. CONCLUSIONS: One Key Question® did not capture current pregnancy prevention desires of a sizeable minority of respondents. IMPLICATIONS: A pregnancy prevention-focused screening approach may be better suited to identify those in need of contraceptive services compared to pregnancy intention screening.

The status of person-centered contraceptive care in the United States: Results from a nationally representative sample.

CONTEXT: The Person-Centered Contraceptive Care measure (PCCC) evaluates patient experience of contraceptive counseling, a construct not represented within United States surveillance metrics of contraceptive care. We explore use of PCCC in a national probability sample and examine predictors of person-centered contraceptive care. METHODS: Among 2228 women from the 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth who reported receiving contraceptive care in the last year, we conducted univariate and multivariable linear regression to identify associations between individual characteristics and PCCC scores. RESULTS: PCCC scores were high ( x ¯ : 17.84, CI: 17.59-18.08 on a 4-20 scale), yet varied across characteristics. In adjusted analyses, Hispanic identity with Spanish language primacy and non-Hispanic other or multiple racial identities were significantly associated with lower average PCCC scores compared to those of non-Hispanic white identity (B = -1.232 [-1.970, -0.493]; B = -0.792 [-1.411, -0.173]). Gay, lesbian, or bisexual identity was associated with lower average PCCC scores compared to heterosexual (B = -0.673 [-1.243, -0.103]). PCCC scores had a positive association with incomes of 150%-299% and ≥300% of the federal poverty level compared to those of income <150% (150%-299%: B = 0.669 [0.198, 1.141]; ≥300%: B = 0.892 [0.412, 1.372]). Cannabis use in the past year was associated with lower PCCC scores (B = -0.542 [-0.971, -0.113]). CONCLUSIONS: The PCCC can capture differential experiences of contraceptive care to monitor patient experience and to motivate and track care quality over time. Differences in reported quality of care have implications for informing national priorities for contraceptive care improvements.

Development of My Decision/Mi Decisión, a web-based decision aid to support permanent contraception decision making.

Objective: To develop a patient-centered, web-based decision aid to support informed and value-concordant decision making among Medicaid enrollees considering tubal sterilization. Methods: We used the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) to guide systematic development of our decision aid. We interviewed 15 obstetrician-gynecologists and 40 women, who had considered or were considering tubal sterilization. A Steering Committee-comprising healthcare providers, social scientists, reproductive health and justice advocates, and people with lived experience-provided feedback and direction. We developed English and Spanish prototypes, which were beta tested with 24 women. Results: The resulting web-based My Decision/Mi Decisión tool (English/Spanish) includes written and video information about tubal sterilization procedures; an interactive table of contraception options; values clarification exercises; reflection and deliberation; knowledge checks; and a summary report to share with one's provider. Users found the decision aid to be informative, engaging, easy to use, and helpful in informing contraception decision making. Conclusion: My Decision/Mi Decisión is a scalable tool that could be implemented widely to support informed decision making about tubal sterilization. Innovation: This is a novel and timely web-based decision tool for tubal sterilization, when demand for permanent contraception is rapidly increasing post-Dobbs. While designed for Medicaid enrollees, further investigation will explore more generalized use.

A decision support tool has similar high PrEP uptake and increases early PrEP persistence in adolescent girls and young women in South Africa: results from a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: African adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) have high rates of HIV acquisition and are a priority population for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). PrEP implementation has been limited by AGYW's low perceived HIV risk and provider demands. A decision support tool (DST) with information about PrEP could improve clients' risk perception, knowledge about PrEP, informed decision-making and motivation to use PrEP based on their risk, facilitating PrEP delivery in primary healthcare (PHC) clinics. METHODS: We designed MyPrEP, a client-facing DST about PrEP and HIV prevention, with youth-friendly information and images. The impact of the MyPrEP tool was assessed among HIV-negative women aged 18-25 years presenting to a PHC clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa from March 2019 to 2020. AGYW were randomized by day to the DST or a general health website as the control condition. A clinician blinded to DST versus control allocation provided standard of care counselling about PrEP, offered PrEP, administered a questionnaire and conducted sexually transmitted infection testing. The primary outcome was PrEP initiation and the secondary outcome was PrEP persistence at 1 month, determined by pharmacy dispensation records. RESULTS: Of 386 AGYW screened, 353 were randomized (DST n = 172, control n = 181) with a median age of 21 years (interquartile range [IQR] 20, 23) and 56% (199/353) attending the clinic for HIV testing, 46% (164/353) using contraception, 15% (53/353) using condoms consistently and 37% (108/353) with a curable sexually transmitted infection. PrEP was initiated by 97% in the DST group and 94% in the control group (OR 1.79; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.79-1.53), of whom two-thirds planned to continue PrEP until they decided if they liked PrEP. At 1 month, PrEP persistence was 19% in the DST and 10% in the control group (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.08-3.69). Ninety-nine percent randomized to the DST reported satisfaction with MyPrEP. CONCLUSIONS: Among AGYW attending a South African PHC clinic, PrEP uptake was >90% with two-fold higher PrEP persistence at 1 month in those randomized to use the MyPrEP DST. Given the need for strategies to support PrEP implementation and improve low PrEP persistence among African AGYW, a PrEP DST warrants further evaluation.

"They Go Hand in Hand": Perspectives on the Relationship Between the Core Values of Family Medicine and Abortion Provision Among Family Physicians Who Do Not Oppose Abortion.

INTRODUCTION: Most family physicians do not provide abortion care, despite an apparent alignment between the defined values of family medicine and provision of abortion in primary care. This study seeks to understand how family physicians themselves perceive the relationship between their specialty's values and abortion provision. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews in 2019 with 56 family physicians who do not oppose abortion in the United States. We employed a deductive-inductive content analysis approach with memos to identify key themes. This analysis focuses on participants' beliefs in the core values of family medicine and how those values relate to abortion in family medicine. RESULTS: Participants identified and described six values of the specialty they prioritized, which included relationships, care across the lifespan, whole-person care, nonjudgmental care, meeting community needs, and social justice. Family physicians in the study overwhelmingly believed that abortion aligned with family medicine values, regardless of whether they themselves provided abortion care. CONCLUSIONS: Providing abortion care in primary care settings gives family physicians an opportunity to provide comprehensive care while improving access to meet community needs. As abortion care becomes increasingly restricted in the United States, family physicians can manifest the values of family medicine through integrating abortion care into their practices in states where abortion remains legal.

Prioritizing patient experience: Validation of the person-centered contraceptive counseling measure as a performance measure.

OBJECTIVE: A performance measure assessing how often patients experience patient-centered contraceptive counseling can inform quality improvement in contraceptive care and enable efforts to enhance equity in the provision of this care. We sought to test the validity and reliability of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) measure as a performance measure, in preparation for application for endorsement from the National Quality Forum. STUDY DESIGN: We combined data from two research studies, a statewide quality improvement assessment, and a dedicated data collection effort at nine sites, all collected between 2009 and 2019 at 22 total sites in the United States, to evaluate the validity and reliability of the four-item PCCC measure aggregated at the provider and facility level. We scored the PCCC dichotomously as a "top-box" score of 20 versus less than 20. We assessed reliability using the Spearman-Brown coefficient, and validity by comparing scores on the PCCC to aggregated scores on single-item measures of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: We included 22 facilities and 34 providers in the analyses. The average PCCC top-box score by provider and facility was 81% and 79%, respectively. We found adequate reliability with panel sizes of 20-50. PCCC scores were strongly associated with the single-item measures of satisfaction. There were notable disparities by race/ethnicity and language (Spanish vs English) in PCCC scores. DISCUSSION: The PCCC is a valid and reliable performance measure for use at the provider and facility level. The development and use of the measures of patient experience, like the PCCC, is critical for prioritizing patient-centeredness in reproductive health care. IMPLICATIONS: The PCCC measure can facilitate the identification of gaps and disparities in patient-centered contraceptive counseling and enable quality improvement to promote quality, equitable contraceptive care. Using this measure provides the opportunity to enhance patient experience of care and build trust between contraceptive providers and the communities they serve.

Postpartum Family Planning in Pediatrics: A Survey of Parental Contraceptive Needs and Health Services Preferences.

OBJECTIVE: Infant well-child visits are increasingly being explored as opportunities to address parental postpartum health needs, including those related to reproductive health. To inform potential pediatric clinic-based interventions, this study assessed postpartum contraceptive needs and health services preferences. METHODS: We surveyed postpartum individuals attending 2 to 6-month well-child visits at three Northern California pediatric clinics (2019-20). We examined unmet contraceptive needs; the acceptability of contraceptive education, counseling, and provision at well-child visits; and sociodemographic and clinical correlates. We conducted univariate and multivariable regression modeling to assess associations between sociodemographic and clinical variables, the status of contraceptive needs, and acceptability measures. RESULTS: Study participants (n = 263) were diverse in terms of race and ethnicity (13% Asian, 9% Black, 37% Latinx, 12% Multi-racial or Other, 29% White), and socioeconomic status. Overall, 25% had unmet contraceptive needs. Unmet need was more common among participants who had delivered more recently, were multiparous, or reported ≥ 1 barrier to obtaining contraception; postpartum visit attendance, education, race, and ethnicity were not associated with unmet need. Most participants deemed the following acceptable in the pediatric clinic: receiving contraceptive information (85%), discussing contraception (86%), and obtaining a contraceptive method (81%). Acceptability of these services was greater among participants with unmet contraceptive needs, better self-rated health, and private insurance (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of participants had unmet contraceptive needs beyond the early postpartum period. Most considered the pediatric clinic an acceptable place to address contraception, suggesting the pediatric clinic may be a suitable setting for interventions aiming to prevent undesired pregnancies and their sequelae.

Elevating the patient voice in contraceptive care quality improvement: A qualitative study of patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive care.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-centeredness is an important indicator of peripartum contraceptive care quality. Prior work demonstrates how care fragmentation, provider biases, and other factors sometimes undermine the patient-centeredness and quality of this care. To guide the design of future quality improvement interventions, we explored patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive care. STUDY DESIGN: For this qualitative study, we recruited a convenience sample of individuals receiving prenatal care at the study site and participating in an online survey about their experience of peripartum contraceptive care during February-July 2020. We conducted individual, in-depth, semistructured interviews to assess patients' preferences for peripartum contraceptive care. Using inductive and deductive qualitative content analysis, we evaluated interview data for patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive counseling and organized preferences into domains to inform future quality measurement. RESULTS: Interviews (lasting 7-26 min) included 21 postpartum individuals, who were largely White with high levels of formal education. Many participants described suboptimal care experiences characterized by insufficient information, inadequate centering of patient values, and, occasionally, disrespectful care. We identified four key themes describing patients' desire for (1) comprehensive, anticipatory information from one's peripartum provider; (2) counseling and decision-making that (a) prioritize patient preferences and values and (b) avoid pressure; (3) care that respects patient feelings and wishes; and (4) provider responsiveness to individual patient preferences regarding timing and frequency of counseling. CONCLUSIONS: We newly identify four key domains of patient preferences for peripartum contraceptive care. Additional research is needed to understand peripartum contraceptive care preferences among diverse patient populations. Future research should develop validated measures for evaluating the patient experience of peripartum contraceptive care at scale, as part of ongoing efforts to improve the quality and respectfulness of peripartum care. IMPLICATIONS: Patients want peripartum contraceptive care to provide comprehensive, anticipatory information; elicit and respond to their counseling and decision-making preferences; and demonstrate respect for their wishes.

Consent for trainee participation in abortion care: A qualitative study of patient experiences and preferences in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Abortion training for clinicians is crucial to ensure patients' future access to full-spectrum reproductive healthcare. Given the complex sociopolitical context of abortion, consent to allow a trainee's involvement in abortion care requires careful attention to avoid harm to patients while also ensuring adequate clinician training for the future provision of care. In order to inform the development of patient-centered recommendations, we assessed patient experiences and preferences around consent for trainee participation during abortion care. STUDY DESIGN: We interviewed participants who received abortion care at sites with medical trainees in the United States. We conducted interviews via zoom (video-off) between August 2021 and January 2022. We audio-recorded and transcribed the interviews. We coded transcripts using NVivo software and analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four (n = 24) participants reflected a diverse range of sociodemographics as well as location of abortion service. Some reported experiences of coercion related to trainee involvement, ranging from subtle to overt. Participants preferred consent for trainee involvement in abortion care be a process outside the procedure room, while clothed, without the trainer or trainee present to allow for time to consider options without pressure to say yes. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered approaches to seeking consent for trainee involvement in abortion care must reduce potential for coercion. A standardized consent before the procedure room by a trained staff member without the trainer or trainee present can help prioritize patient autonomy. Understanding care team member roles and upholding confidentiality and privacy are paramount to patients feeling safe with trainees present. IMPLICATIONS: Our finding that patients experience varying levels of coercion to allow trainee participation in their abortion care highlights the dire need for patient-centered systemic changes-such as ensuring that consent take place outside the procedure room in a scripted fashion at eye level, while patients are clothed, and without trainers/trainees present-to maintain patient autonomy.

Pregnancy Conceptualizations in Women Who Have Had Recent Bariatric Surgery.

Objectives: To describe bariatric surgery patients' perioperative conceptualizations about pregnancy. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study performed in 2016, evaluating a nationally recruited convenience sample of U.S. women aged 18-45 years who underwent bariatric surgery within the past 24 months. We assessed four pregnancy constructs: intent, desire, emotional orientation, and importance to avoid. We examined relationships between constructs, with time since surgery, postoperative pregnancy, and contraceptive use using descriptive statistics. Results: We included 363 eligible women (response rate 80%). Participant median age was 36 years, 71% (n = 258) were White, 77% (n = 279) were sexually active at the time of the study, and 39% (n = 140) experienced preoperative infertility. Most reported no desire to become pregnant (59%, n = 175) and that it was important to avoid pregnancy (78%, n = 283) within the first 24 months after surgery. Relationships between constructs were complex. Respondents in their first postoperative year more likely reported they would feel upset about a hypothetical pregnancy (40%, n = 74) than those in their second year (27%, n = 48, p = 0.02). Of those with a postoperative pregnancy, 46% (n = 17) felt it was important to avoid pregnancy compared with 81% (n = 266) of those who did not have a pregnancy (p < 0.001). Most used postoperative contraception (66%, n = 241), and those who felt it was important to avoid pregnancy more likely used contraception (82%, n = 197) than those who did not feel it was important (18%, n = 44, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Women undergoing bariatric surgery have diverse and complex conceptualizations about future pregnancy. These varied based on time from surgery and influenced postoperative contraceptive use.

Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women: Provider Perspectives on Maternal Contraceptive Care in Pediatric Settings.

OBJECTIVE: Closely spaced, mistimed, and unwanted pregnancies are common among postpartum women and can lead to adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Women inconsistently attend postpartum obstetric visits, though they reliably interface with pediatric providers during the postpartum months, presenting novel opportunities to identify and address unmet family planning needs. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study to explore pediatric provider perspectives on addressing maternal family planning in three settings: a neonatal intensive care unit, a primary care clinic, and a high-risk infant follow-up clinic. RESULTS: Pediatric providers were generally open to incorporating postpartum family planning screening and counseling into a pediatric encounter, if given appropriate training and implementation support. Providers largely agreed that contraceptive provision to women was not feasible in their practices, and they shared ideas for utilizing the pediatric encounter to connect women with comprehensive contraceptive care. CONCLUSION: Pediatric providers perceived postpartum family planning screening and counseling, and not contraceptive provision, as potentially acceptable and feasible in their practice settings. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop postpartum family planning interventions for pediatrics.

Examining socioeconomic status disparities in facility-based childbirth in Kenya: role of perceived need, accessibility, and quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Giving birth in health facilities with skilled birth attendants (SBAs) is one of the key efforts promoted to reduce preventable maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. However, research has revealed large socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in facility-based childbirth. We seek to extend the literature on the factors underlying these SES disparities. Drawing on the Disparities in Skilled Birth Attendance (DiSBA) framework, we examined the contribution of three proximal factors-perceived need, accessibility, and quality of care-that influence the use of SBAs. METHODS: We used data from a survey conducted in Migori County, Kenya in 2016, among women aged 15-49 years who gave birth nine weeks before the survey (N = 1020). The primary outcome is facility-based childbirth. The primary predictors are wealth, measured in quintiles calculated from a wealth index based on principal component analysis of household assets, and highest education level attained. Proposed mediating variables include maternal perceptions of need, accessibility (physical and financial), and quality of care (antenatal services received and experience of care). Logistic regression with mediation analysis was used to investigate the mediating effects. RESULTS: Overall, 85% of women in the sample gave birth in a health facility. Women in the highest wealth quintile were more likely to give birth in a facility than women in the lowest quintile, controlling for demographic factors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.69-5.22). College-educated women were five times more likely than women with no formal education or primary education to give birth in a health facility (aOR: 4.96; 95% CI: 1.43-17.3). Women who gave birth in health facilities had higher perceived accessibility and quality of care than those who gave birth at home. The five mediators were estimated to account for between 15% and 48% of the differences in facility births between women in the lowest and higher wealth quintiles. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm SES disparities in facility-based childbirth, with the proximal factors accounting for some of these differences. These proximal factors - particularly perceived accessibility and quality of care - warrant attention due to their relationship with facility-birth overall, and their impact on inequities in this care.